|
Post by turbokinetic on Sept 17, 2024 14:56:22 GMT
Looks good and clean with very little corrosion. I expect you will be able to refurbish the compressor fairly easily.
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Sept 19, 2024 1:14:43 GMT
Ok, some pretty unexpected stuff happened after the last test. Me being tired from the bad result, I just walked away from it all and left the valves closed with the vacuum still in the compressor. To my surprise when I returned two days later, it had now reached a small positive pressure! This could only mean one thing. I didn't shut the valves tight enough! Ok then! I opened them both up and let it run for a cycle before once again, the 4th time, performing the vacuum test. For some reason it took some time now to reach about 20" Hg of vacuum, like at least 30 seconds (as compared to only a few revolutions earlier). But once there I turned it off and quickly shut the discharge valve.
There was some visible rise in pressure during the first minutes, and just as I was getting up to go away for a while I heard a little *poof* sound. Umm...what? In just a second, and with the valves now firmly shut, it was up to like 15 psi?! At first I thought, vad i helvete? This is just too damn weird. HOW can that be? Am I dreaming some surreal dream here or something? It shouldn't be possible! After thinking about it for a while, the only theory I could come up with was that in a pocket somewhere, maybe in the line to the gauge or the line to the sylphon in the switch, it must have had liquid SO2 held in it by capillary force. Then in the vacuum slowly beginning to boil off at the top until all of it left was suddenly released in an instant, creating this pressure. Either that or a strange pocket of liquid SO2 under the compressor oil? Anyway, I opened up the discharge valve a little bit and again ran the pressure down to 20" Hg. There was also this time some pressure rise during the first hour, but then it settled at 13" Hg and stayed there! That's by far the best reading I got to this date while performing these beginner vacuum tests.
With that said, there are some things I failed to mention when I wrote the post after test #3. As I said, I purged the air by loosening the flare at the discharge valve before the test. However, the service manual is clear on the fact that you have to purge the air very carefully, to not disturb the SO2 vapor underneath it. When I loosened the flare, I had to apply a LOT of force, before it would let go with a SNAP. (It appears as being completely untouched possibly all the time since first being mounted there in the 1920's.) This snap made the compressor shake wildly up and down in the suspension! But I carried on anyway and loosened the flare just so much I could hear it seep and purged the air. Then I performed the failed test #3 and when realising I didn't shut the valves tight enough I decided, ok I'll just start it up now that I purged the air and let it run and see what happens with the knocking sound. The sound was back after a day of running. Ok, so now in this mess we're back at just before start of test #4 when I also realise I probably didn't purge the air well enough the first time. I'll just do it again, since now the flare will let go much easier (even though I had to tighten it down pretty hard to make it stop leaking, as indicated by the handy little check with ammonia the manual says to perform). So again I purged the air. I let it seep until the other handy little indicator set off (the one you know is buzzing when you stop being able to breathe 😅). After that I performed the more successful vacuum test #4. Having seen the result of that I decided to power the fridge back up again and continue examining the knocking occurance.
That was three days ago. It has now been up and running since then and the knocking sound has so far not returned!
Now I did say I was going to get the compressor out. But apparantly there's still some slight chance I might not have to take this system apart. Or at least not the compressor. If that comes true, it's just unbelievable. But right now we have to wait some more and see how this will evolve before we can tell for sure. (And sure I want to be before doing anything with it.)
Sorry for long text again
Regards Sasha
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Sept 19, 2024 2:22:35 GMT
Time for some more images. 😊 The first three below are also from this year but before any operation commenced. Best shooting angle I could get of shaft seal area From above (the flash combined with dust makes it look a lot more grey here than it is. In reality, all of this is pretty much black in colour) Shaft seal area. It's damn near impossible to get a better shot of it than these three while everything is still sitting in place. Moving on. Now some recent pictures from when working on this fridge. The evaporator front removed for better monitoring of the frosting and etcetera. Unit turned off and vacuum test in progress. Manifold gauge hose connected, valve protection caps removed Discharge valve when protection cap removed Regards Sasha
|
|
marko
7 Cubic Foot
Posts: 159
|
Post by marko on Sept 20, 2024 11:28:59 GMT
I suppose I could start investigating the possibilitys of getting hold of SO2 around here. However, I do have a box of 750 grams of sulfur powder laying on the shelf. Couldn't I burn it up and then somehow easily condensate its vapors to some container which I in turn may connect to the manifold gauge and charge it to the fridge? 🙂 Regards Sasha You could produce SO2 by burning sulfer, but collecting the gas and purifying and dehydrating may prove difficult. I have seen what I believe may be the easiest, most economical way to produce SO2 is a method by which gold refiners bubble sulfer dioxide through chloroauric acid to precipitate the gold from solution, it is a simple procedure. In a flask make a slurry of sodium metabisulfite and water. Arrange a stopper and delivery tube such that sulfuric acid may be introduced to the slurry at a controlled rate. The sulfuric acid reacts with the sodium metabisulfite to produce sulfer dioxide. Route the delivery tube to another stoppered flask as to bubble the SO2 through sulfuric acid to scrub the gas. This is high purity SO2, but it would be good to insure its dryness, possibly by passing it through a drier containing silica gel (silicon dioxide).
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Sept 23, 2024 0:46:41 GMT
I suppose I could start investigating the possibilitys of getting hold of SO2 around here. However, I do have a box of 750 grams of sulfur powder laying on the shelf. Couldn't I burn it up and then somehow easily condensate its vapors to some container which I in turn may connect to the manifold gauge and charge it to the fridge? 🙂 Regards Sasha You could produce SO2 by burning sulfer, but collecting the gas and purifying and dehydrating may prove difficult. I have seen what I believe may be the easiest, most economical way to produce SO2 is a method by which gold refiners bubble sulfer dioxide through chloroauric acid to precipitate the gold from solution, it is a simple procedure. In a flask make a slurry of sodium metabisulfite and water. Arrange a stopper and delivery tube such that sulfuric acid may be introduced to the slurry at a controlled rate. The sulfuric acid reacts with the sodium metabisulfite to produce sulfer dioxide. Route the delivery tube to another stoppered flask as to bubble the SO2 through sulfuric acid to scrub the gas. This is high purity SO2, but it would be good to insure its dryness, possibly by passing it through a drier containing silica gel (silicon dioxide). I must say I'm not really educated when it comes to chemistry. The little I know I learned when sometimes needing to know some specific characteristics. Like in this case with the fridge and its refrigerant. Nevertheless, what you say is interesting. I take it this process will have to be done in a sealed system that will come under pressure? Presumably in glass flasks? Also, I assume the sulfuric acid will be best used in its concentrated form, at least in the second stage? For the moment being I lack any equipment and practical experience of these sorts of things. But probably the biggest obstacle to being able to perform this I would say is that around here you're not even allowed to buy sulfuric acid solution for lead-acid batteries. Let alone concentrated sulfuric acid. I just begun investigating how to get hold of SO2 and called a nearby gas depot. I don't know for how long that particular one has been in operation but apparantly they seldom get requests for sulfur dioxide. As a matter of fact, they never received one before! LOL Feels like I got some way to go still... Regards Sasha
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Sept 23, 2024 2:38:43 GMT
Looks good and clean with very little corrosion. I expect you will be able to refurbish the compressor fairly easily. Hey David! I watched one of your videos before where you replaced the electrical motors rubber mount bushings with that from a GM cars sway bar (don't remember which make or model). However, while the bushings on this compressor unit are in like new condition... ...there's another bushing which is for some strange reason now crumbling away: The belt tensioner mount bushing. (WHAT'S THIS! It's not even been 100 years!) I was just wondering if you encountered this and if so, how did you rebuild/replace it? The pin in the middle on which the spring runs was about to come loose on mine. Now that I am performing endurance tests and having to run the unit for days on end I figured this have to be taken care of immediately, so it won't let go completely and cause a disaster! I came up with this quick solution: Another spring that simply pulls the pin itself down in place! This will keep it there in place for now. And it did greatly reduce swaying in the motor and belt. But eventually a permanent solution will be needed. Hence this humble question of mine for you, while I'm at it anyway flooding the thread with more new pictures. 😊 And for a progress update. The unit is still up and running. It has now been going for a full week and the compressor is going strong. There have been some minor intermittent knockings the whole time (as compared to knocking 100% of the running time earlier, once it did start to knock), but it does not seem to be getting any worse. I think there might be a small pocket of air remaining inside, possibly drawn in during the last vacuum test a week ago. Regards Sasha
|
|
marko
7 Cubic Foot
Posts: 159
|
Post by marko on Sept 23, 2024 10:00:04 GMT
I must say I'm not really educated when it comes to chemistry. The little I know I learned when sometimes needing to know some specific characteristics. Like in this case with the fridge and its refrigerant. Nevertheless, what you say is interesting. I take it this process will have to be done in a sealed system that will come under pressure? Presumably in glass flasks? Also, I assume the sulfuric acid will be best used in its concentrated form, at least in the second stage? For the moment being I lack any equipment and practical experience of these sorts of things. But probably the biggest obstacle to being able to perform this I would say is that around here you're not even allowed to buy sulfuric acid solution for lead-acid batteries. Let alone concentrated sulfuric acid. I just begun investigating how to get hold of SO2 and called a nearby gas depot. I don't know for how long that particular one has been in operation but apparantly they seldom get requests for sulfur dioxide. As a matter of fact, they never received one before! LOL Feels like I got some way to go still... Regards Sasha Yes, the system would be made of glass flasks and the SO2 would be delivered under slightly over atmospheric pressure of the generator. Trying to use such a system to produce a pressurized gas in a container would not be wise. I do not think the concentration of H2SO4 is critical, and the second vessel, the bubbler/scrubber, may not really be needed. Of course, all this is for naught if you can not procure H2SO4!
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Sept 24, 2024 18:47:11 GMT
Yes, the system would be made of glass flasks and the SO2 would be delivered under slightly over atmospheric pressure of the generator. Trying to use such a system to produce a pressurized gas in a container would not be wise. I do not think the concentration of H2SO4 is critical, and the second vessel, the bubbler/scrubber, may not really be needed. Of course, all this is for naught if you can not procure H2SO4! You could always drain some old car batteries I suppose. If it's not an issue with having some lead contamination in the sulfuric acid in this process? When researching yesterday about what you said I came across this video below, on youtube I thought it'd be interesting to see, but I'm not sure whether this method would be easier or harder than the one suggested by you He melts and burns sulfur in a burning dish under an inverted funnel routes the SO2 gas via a makeshift drier consisting of two cotton pads with calcium chloride in between them, encased in a big syringe the gas will then go into a test tube placed in a dry ice aceton bath where it will condense into liquid state, led there by means of aspirator pump after that the test tube is replaced by another empty tube in the cold bath and then connected to the first tube with the unpure SO2 in it the SO2 is then transferred from the first tube to the new one by simply letting it vaporize itself, leaving the impurities behind. The question here is of course how pure the purified SO2 will actually be, given that the sulfur wasn't burned in oxygen, but in ordinary air (which we know is a mixture of gases). Any takes on that? Regards Sasha
|
|
marko
7 Cubic Foot
Posts: 159
|
Post by marko on Sept 25, 2024 16:26:55 GMT
The question here is of course how pure the purified SO2 will actually be, given that the sulfur wasn't burned in oxygen, but in ordinary air (which we know is a mixture of gases). Any takes on that? Regards Sasha That video is fascinating. The person who did this is very smart. I think that after the distillation the SO2 would be pure for most practical purposes, almost certainly for refrigeration. If it were a concern, the vapor pressure could be compared to published known data.
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Nov 1, 2024 5:27:02 GMT
I might have a little update in the making, intended on coming soon. Before getting to that I want to bring this up: The electrical motor! From what I read in the service manual the F compressor has a 1/5 Hp motor. On 220V that one will draw a current of 3A. But why do I need to look in the manual for some basic specs like that? The reason is simple: It's ID-plate is disappeared! This leads me to believe that in the past there has been an event with the motor where they needed to get it out for repairs and something happened in the handling of the motor that made the tag accidentally come off. Either that or someone intentionally removed it for some bizarre reason. I can't see how this riveted plate could fall off by itself when the motor is sitting in place well shielded in the compressor apartment. For precaution I have shined a light under the suspended compressor rack also and from what I can see it's not laying there either. I'm looking for answers to some questions regarding this. The main ones are these: - Is this still the 1/5 Hp motor?
- A potential repair may have been on those a little infamous centrifugal weights. How to know if it have the good ones or the bad ones?
- Since this motors internals are untouched for many many decades, in what condition can we expect the oil wicks to be?
- From what I can remember from rewireing in 2017, there's no overload protection present at all. Best way to solve this?
I hope I'm not overloading you with questions now...
Edit
Now that I think about it, I don't know the nature of those ID-plates. If they are maybe thin and stands the chance of possibly being accidentally teared off for some reason when for example maintenance work on the compressor unit is being performed by a serviceman. Regards Sasha
|
|
|
Post by turbokinetic on Nov 1, 2024 13:16:07 GMT
Good morning Sasha.
A - The motor should be a 1/5 HP and it appears to be the correct motor. The nameplate is aluminum. They do not tear off easily, so likely someone used that area to pry, or they removed the nameplate on purpose. I have several motors and parts of motors in the shop and will look today to see what the specs for the 1/5 HP motor are.
B - If you can get some manner of picture looking into the front (drive end) ventilation openings I can identify the weights.
C - The oil wicks should be OK as long as they have not been run while dry. Since you oiled it before starting up, likely the oil wicks are still good.
D - There should be some form of protection. In the models sold in the States, there could have been an Allen-Bradley melting alloy overload breaker located under the cold control. Yours has a blank cover in this place. There were also models with a screw-in time-delay fuse mounted in the same place. It is possible that the power cord was equipped with a fused mains plug which had a time delay fuse in place.
I would recommend installing a "Klixon" style overload breaker in the circuit to take care of any issues. These can be tucked away in the compartment below the cold control. Once the amp draw of the motor is known, you can select an overload size accordingly.
Sincerely, David
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Nov 3, 2024 8:39:09 GMT
Good morning Sasha. A - The motor should be a 1/5 HP and it appears to be the correct motor. The nameplate is aluminum. They do not tear off easily, so likely someone used that area to pry, or they removed the nameplate on purpose. I have several motors and parts of motors in the shop and will look today to see what the specs for the 1/5 HP motor are. B - If you can get some manner of picture looking into the front (drive end) ventilation openings I can identify the weights. C - The oil wicks should be OK as long as they have not been run while dry. Since you oiled it before starting up, likely the oil wicks are still good. D - There should be some form of protection. In the models sold in the States, there could have been an Allen-Bradley melting alloy overload breaker located under the cold control. Yours has a blank cover in this place. There were also models with a screw-in time-delay fuse mounted in the same place. It is possible that the power cord was equipped with a fused mains plug which had a time delay fuse in place. I would recommend installing a "Klixon" style overload breaker in the circuit to take care of any issues. These can be tucked away in the compartment below the cold control. Once the amp draw of the motor is known, you can select an overload size accordingly. Sincerely, David Thanks David for great replies! I did some photograhing today through the front ventilation of the motor but the weights appeared a lot more dusty on the photos than IRL, to the point of seeing the actual surface on them became difficult. I have to try and get the dust off and give it another go. So I'll get back to you on that one. (When doing that I could also hook up a multimeter and measure the amps which I forgot about.) A big reason why I started worrying about the oil wicks was that when I first powered the unit up earlier this year I added some oil (like a teaspoon in each lubrication tube). But some week later I discovered that some amount of it just flowed right through and down into the bottom of the housing and then further down out on the outside of the motor. When it comes to the protection, "Klixon" was like what I had in mind. I read about it earlier in your posts but couldn't remember just the term or where it was mentioned. I did some initial searching now and got some results, but there was little to no specs provided. I wouldn't mind having one of those neat original ones that seem to be common (at least in the USA) on Frigidaires, with the reset button. Though I don't know if that will be feasible. If not, I'm ok with settling for a Klixon type breaker. As of my findings today, there's indeed no protection installed. Here's a pic I took today from inside of the little electrical box underneath the control unit. I'm not sure if the blank cover plate (as seen in earlier posted photos) is original. It can't be ruled out that it was actually put there later on. There is a trace of something behind it, a round piece that two wires is going through. I didn't get what that piece was for back in 2017. But I let everything be the way it was when I did the rewiring, so the old wires will have been placed the same way. (I unscrewed the black plastic covering on the right connector only so that you could see how it looks like underneath them.) Some follow up questions: - Did I maybe overoil the motor?
- The Allen-Bradley overload breaker, is that the one with the reset button? (Only available in USA?)
- From the photo above. You got any idea of what the round thing with cables going through it might have to do with?
Regards Sasha
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Nov 5, 2024 3:54:48 GMT
So now I've been at it again and here are the resulting pictures. However, it appears as now when I got rid of most of the dust there's some black residue on much of the centrifugal weights also. I don't know if this will be an obstacle in the determination if they are good or bad weights. If so I'll have to scrape it off with a screwdriver or something. While I'm at it I'll throw in a picture from underneath the electric cover on the side of the motor as well: No protection device inunder here either. I finally remembered to measure the amps of the motor today also! Keep in mind this is on 220V. It started out at 2,13A in the very beginning, then jumped to 2,63A when the brushes released from the commutator and motor switching over to running mode, after which it fell down to 1,87A. From that point it kept gradually falling until just hitting 1,76A when the on-cycle was over and it shut off. This was a normal on-cycle with cabinet temperature pulled down, Cold Control at setting 1, and with a very light load on the refrigeration system (due to ambient temperature not fully reaching room temp). Running time was with its 4 minutes 15 seconds somewhat longer though. That's because the previous off-cycle became longer than usual due to me extending it by starting to do the serial hook-up of the multimeter just before it would've ended. Otherwise it hardly exceeds 3 minutes on-time in current conditions. Regards Sasha
|
|
|
Post by turbokinetic on Nov 5, 2024 13:46:11 GMT
Good morning Sasha. A - The motor should be a 1/5 HP and it appears to be the correct motor. The nameplate is aluminum. They do not tear off easily, so likely someone used that area to pry, or they removed the nameplate on purpose. I have several motors and parts of motors in the shop and will look today to see what the specs for the 1/5 HP motor are. B - If you can get some manner of picture looking into the front (drive end) ventilation openings I can identify the weights. C - The oil wicks should be OK as long as they have not been run while dry. Since you oiled it before starting up, likely the oil wicks are still good. D - There should be some form of protection. In the models sold in the States, there could have been an Allen-Bradley melting alloy overload breaker located under the cold control. Yours has a blank cover in this place. There were also models with a screw-in time-delay fuse mounted in the same place. It is possible that the power cord was equipped with a fused mains plug which had a time delay fuse in place. I would recommend installing a "Klixon" style overload breaker in the circuit to take care of any issues. These can be tucked away in the compartment below the cold control. Once the amp draw of the motor is known, you can select an overload size accordingly. Sincerely, David Thanks David for great replies! I did some photograhing today through the front ventilation of the motor but the weights appeared a lot more dusty on the photos than IRL, to the point of seeing the actual surface on them became difficult. I have to try and get the dust off and give it another go. So I'll get back to you on that one. (When doing that I could also hook up a multimeter and measure the amps which I forgot about.) The pictures help. Unfortunately you DO have the pot-metal weights but yours appear to have been preserved well by the oil which has seeped onto them. This is more or less normal for these motors. There is an overflow port on the housings, for the event in which the bearings are overfilled with oil. The front bearing isn't such a worry but the rear one can get oil on the commutator if overfilled, so they designed it to drip out of the motor below the commutator. The Allen-Bradley overloads are neat. They are a melting-alloy design with a heater (resistor.) The heater carries the current of the motor and heats a special low-temperature solder joint. If the solder melts, the joint can pivot allowing the protector to trip. I would happily give you one but the heater would be configured for two times the amps you need; since it is from a motor wired for 120V. I don't know where one could source a heater for these at this time. It could be similar to what is still used in mechanical overload relays but I am not sure. One option (which I have done, admittedly) is to install this for decorative purposes only and also include a Klixon-type overload behind it. I can't identify that cardboard ring; although I expect it was originally part of a fuseholder. More than likely it was engineered to use a style of replaceable fuse common in your region at the time it was installed. So now I've been at it again and here are the resulting pictures. However, it appears as now when I got rid of most of the dust there's some black residue on much of the centrifugal weights also. I don't know if this will be an obstacle in the determination if they are good or bad weights. If so I'll have to scrape it off with a screwdriver or something. While I'm at it I'll throw in a picture from underneath the electric cover on the side of the motor as well: No protection device inunder here either. I finally remembered to measure the amps of the motor today also! Keep in mind this is on 220V. It started out at 2,13A in the very beginning, then jumped to 2,63A when the brushes released from the commutator and motor switching over to running mode, after which it fell down to 1,87A. From that point it kept gradually falling until just hitting 1,76A when the on-cycle was over and it shut off. This was a normal on-cycle with cabinet temperature pulled down, Cold Control at setting 1, and with a very light load on the refrigeration system (due to ambient temperature not fully reaching room temp). Running time was with its 4 minutes 15 seconds somewhat longer though. That's because the previous off-cycle became longer than usual due to me extending it by starting to do the serial hook-up of the multimeter just before it would've ended. Otherwise it hardly exceeds 3 minutes on-time in current conditions. Those currents seem OK. Because you are seeing the brushes lift off and the motor does shift from repulsion-start mode to induction-run mode it seems the centrifugal weights are still moving and working as designed. That is a big plus. Thankfully it seems your fridge's cooling system is still working correctly!
You would want to select an overload rating which will trip at a current above the normal full-load running amps. It seems like your maximum running amps (after transitioning from start to run, and once system pressure was highest) was 1.87A. Since the room was cool, it may draw a little more when the warm season is in effect. I would probably go with an overload which will trip at anything over 120% nominal running current.
All that is good in a perfect world. But, in my experience motors either draw roughly the correct current; or they draw an extreme overcurrent. Gradual overloads aren't common. If you can't find an overload exactly where you need it, always go up a size. If it is undersize it will nuisance trip. That will wear out the overload and eventually it will fail to reset, or worse yet it will fail to trip once needed; burning out the motor.
I am preparing for a road trip and my time may be limited today but I will look at one of the Allen-Bradley overload breakers and see what I can find out about the heater ratings. I have current injection equipment to test the overload and determine what the trip point is.
Glad your project is moving forward well. Thanks for sharing it with us here! Sincerely, David
|
|
|
Post by successionalsasha on Nov 7, 2024 3:45:02 GMT
Thank you David for yet another superior post! All very helpful. The pictures help. Unfortunately you DO have the pot-metal weights but yours appear to have been preserved well by the oil which has seeped onto them. Oh my! I need to be vigilant about these then. Though I don't know how to, more than simply peeking at them regularly looking for anything unusual. Is it mainly because of corrosion that they would break? I read somewhere in your posts that if these weights break it will cause severe damage to the motor. Another thing I noticed while looking at the pictures again is that if you compare the 4th and the 2nd image, which are from opposing sides, on the 4th one there are four holes with what it looks like is some kind of rivets in two of them. On the 2nd pic however, those rivet heads looks like they have let go and fallen down through the holes. Is that something to be concerned about? I can't identify that cardboard ring; although I expect it was originally part of a fuseholder. More than likely it was engineered to use a style of replaceable fuse common in your region at the time it was installed. Ok! I also suspect this might be remains from an earlier protection setup, maybe in the form of some kind of fusing. But hard to know for sure. A picture from our friend Ansgar in Germany comes to mind. On that Frigidaire I saw what appears to be a round fuse holder of some type in place there: I am preparing for a road trip and my time may be limited today but I will look at one of the Allen-Bradley overload breakers and see what I can find out about the heater ratings. I have current injection equipment to test the overload and determine what the trip point is. Cool! Let us know when the results are in. I'll maybe look around some more about the Klixon type breakers meanwhile. But I'll ask here before ordering anything. Glad your project is moving forward well. Thanks for sharing it with us here! Sincerely, David Thanks! I owe it to you guys. If it weren't for you I'd probably still be sitting here clueless with a powered down Frigidaire I'm too afraid of touching. 😏 Regards Sasha
|
|